My Favorite Ladies of Lightning Are BACK!

Thunderpussy (Whitney Petty, guitar & Molly Sides, vocals) performing live at Belltown Bloom 2023; photo by me (which is why the quality is so bad – sorry)

I’m currently writing at least two other posts for this blog, but I guess I’ll have to add a third to that amount because there is NO WAY that I’m going to write this post and then NOT follow up with an album review.

By “my favorite ladies of lightning,” I of course mean THUNDERPUSSY! (All caps not a legit style choice – I’m just excited, because I love them.)

THUNDERPUSSY ARE BAAAAAAACK! With WEST! (All caps – the actual style choice, no exclamation point included.)

I’ve been wondering since 2019 (New Year’s Eve of 2018/2019 was when I first saw Thunderpussy live) when Thunderpussy would release their second album, and while I completely understand a reassessment of the band’s goals after the worldwide shitshow that 2020-current became, I am SO HAPPY and excited that their next album is coming soon – May 10th, to be exact! (I already pre-ordered the album, but I am anxiously awaiting to find out when/if they release a CD of the album. It’s the next-best choice in terms of affordability while still cherishing the physical media aspect; a step up from digital albums in every way, but you’re probably not paying an arm and a leg like you are for the vinyl, even though I am a vinyl collector, myself, but…clearly, mostly of old albums.)

I know WEST is coming out on May 10th, and that’s less than a week away (YAAAAAAY!) from the time I’m posting this, but I’ve been obsessively listening to the three singles available to listen to from the album since I waited to listen to them until my birthday (April 27th), and what a TREAT it was and has been ever since to hear them. So, yes, I’m here to scream about a measly (but oh, are they mighty) three tracks that have reminded me why Thunderpussy are one of my favorite bands, and why I’m proud to have seen them live seven times and why I hope to see them live MANY MORE TIMES!

Since “Firebreather” as a single has been out for over a year now (I had to search my other blog to verify that time frame), I have to admit that the first time I heard it, I wasn’t that impressed. That’s even considering the fact that I’ve seen and heard them play it live. I’ve always liked it live, actually! But the studio version really never grabbed me the way the live version of it could. I’m not sure if it’s the hype I’ve now created (and fueled) in my mind in relation to the new album or what, but I’ve heard it with fresh ears now, seemingly, and the track fucking ROCKS. I even managed to transcribe the lyrics to the first verse (uncertainly, but I tried my best), and when I say it rocks…oh, it doesn’t just rock; it kicks ass and takes names.

Firebreather, welcome to the west side
Living my life, like I’m born out the dust
Get off my back, you son of a bitch!
Gonna take my time and take some chances
Lead the way, spark a change while we’re dancing
You are mistaken when you fuck with my life!”

My favorite line in the first verse is “Lead the way, spark a change while we’re dancing” because if THAT DOESN’T DEFINE THUNDERPUSSY’S MISSION STATEMENT, THEN I JUST DON’T KNOW WHAT DOES. And I, as a fan, will clarify that I absolutely believe that Thunderpussy “lead the way” and “spark a change while we’re dancing,” but that it isn’t just a message about them – it’s also their hope for us, as listeners, fans and lovers of music, and, ultimately, community members.

Musically, “Firebreather” burns hot! The drums, provided by Michelle Nuño, are creative and fun and hard-hitting in the way I’d hope to hear from Thunderpussy, the basslines, provided by Leah Julius, are positively SMOKING, and Whitney Petty’s hard rock guitar underscores the rough edges of the song’s lyrical themes – and that guitar solo is a distorted, psychedelic-dyed mural I am more than happy to gaze upon. Molly Sides’ vocals are rock-appropriate gravelly in all the right places, but there are a couple of instances in the song where I felt her performance did not quite match the conviction of the the line she was singing – such as, in the extraordinarily powerful line “This body ain’t an apology!” Either she went a little flat singing the word “apology,” or I just wasn’t wholly convinced that she was singing it as sincerely as possible…both could be the case, and I hope to hear it sung better/with more certainty live, which I’m sure she will accomplish! Nonetheless, this is one of the three singles in particular that I have been listening to OBSESSIVELY on repeat. So, critiques aside, I’m obsessed with it, and I cannot WAIT to hear it live again – properly, as part of WEST!

“I Can Do Better” is a song that starts out contemplatively slow, but it glows with anticipation promised by the chorus: “I can do better – lord knows I’ve tried/I can do better, just not forever/Only tonight”. That it lends itself to a beautiful strings arrangement only heightens that expectation! And have no fear; the hard rock element that Thunderpussy is famous for remains, as the slow build of the melodic ballad erupts in the chorus and floats into the divinely epic bridge. Musically, it’s atmospheric and gorgeous, with all musicians (Sides, Petty, Julius, and drummer Lindsey Elias) in top form playing with the expertise that I’ve always personally witnessed and recognized from them.

The natural (as in: of nature) lyrical imagery in “I Can Do Better” seems purposeful enough in adding to the chorus’ concept of “I can do better, just not forever”. While I feel it unabashedly leans on apocalyptic themes musically and lyrically, it seems to suggest that languishing in destruction is necessary to spark hope for new growth; after all, in nature, a wildfire does not always mean eternal death – sometimes things must die in order to recover and thrive even better than before. “I can do better” as a phrase, alone, is an acknowledgement that one has failed to do well enough at one time, but that one can improve in the future/next time. I also imagine that the ‘serpent’ in the lines “The wind picked up and the blades of grass/Show us the serpent, reminding us to rest” represents the ouroboros – the snake or dragon eating its own tail symbolizing an eternal cycle of renewal, or the cycle of life, death, and rebirth. (Although “the serpent” may also be a nod to the band’s debut album cover, as well. It was where they started, and they needed rest to come back with WEST!)

Based on those ideas, I would recognize “I Can Do Better” as Thunderpussy’s true ‘return to form’ (and even better than before) track – perfect for the album’s official, first single.

The first time I heard “N.E.D.”, within the first few seconds I thought, ‘Oh, SHIT, THEY ARE SO BACK!‘ THIS is the Thunderpussy that I love! After listening to this song, I think I know why Thunderpussy named this album WEST…besides: the existence of its title track; and “Firebreather”‘s reference in the opening verse, “welcome to the west side”, which also shares this musical influence I’m about to mention; it reminds me musically of themes they explored in their EP Milk It, which I loved, but particularly through the track that sounds like it would perfectly accompany a spaghetti Western, “Trust A Man.” (Side note: I’m a little surprised that “Trust a Man” isn’t on WEST.) While I still have no idea what N.E.D. stands for, musically and lyrically it’s like introducing the wild west to hard rock and lesbians (respectively). Smashing stereotypes everywhere they go – what’s not to love?

My only complaint about this recording (not even necessarily the performance) is that I feel the drums were turned down FAR more in the mix than they should have been. While I hear lots of delicious bass, layered guitars, and KEYBOARDS (FUCK YES, KEYBOARDS IN ROCK MUSIC. ALWAYS! But, then again, my favorite band of all-time is Tom Petty and The Heartbreakers, who would not have been a band AT ALL had it not been for their keyboardist, Benmont Tench), I feel that such a hard rocking song (despite the western-themed melodies) SHOULD have plenty of loud drums. And they’re not loud enough in this – at all! Sure, I could turn the volume up on whatever I’m currently blasting this song out of, but the point remains: why should I have to sacrifice my hearing ability just to hear some good, hard-hitting drums in the mix? Great, that I can hear EVERYTHING else – and it sounds amazing – but, really? You’re going to sacrifice the volume of the drums just to make everything else intelligible? I think…some better decisions could have been made regarding the recording/engineering/mixing of this track (I’m grouping those three tasks as one optionally, because I don’t know how any of them are accomplished, and thus I do not know who exactly was responsible for this…but as barely a musician, myself, and mostly a fan, I can at least make that inference).

Regardless, since my first listen-through of the three singles, “N.E.D.” was the song that I immediately put on repeat. Excluding the volume of the drums, it reminds me of their eponymous song “Thunderpussy” – badass, daring, deliciously distorted rock and roll about wlw (women loving women). Need I say more?

If you happen to catch Thunderpussy’s live introduction to WEST at Benaroya Hall on May 10th, I’d LOVE to hear about how the album translated to a live performance accompanied by a full symphony. I unfortunately will not be able to experience this undoubtedly momentous occasion, myself (I’m hoping the next tour that Thunderpussy embark on will include my Greater Seattle area town – easier for me to get to and get home from), but I feel as stoked for the band’s performance as if I were going to witness it personally, anyway! That’s what it feels like to be part of the community that loves, follows, and leads with Thunderpussy – we are with them as much as they are for us, and anyone who doubts the impact that good music can have might as well be a firebreather.

“Hey Bulldog”: Who Did it Better?

In truth, I’ve posted and written about Fanny’s version of this song, “Hey Bulldog”, so much already, but I’m writing this new post because I’ve found that I actually do have something different to say about it, and I want to do so by intentionally comparing it to the original version.

If you aren’t already familiar with The Beatles’ version of this song (the original version), 1) you’re lucky, and 2) I would actually like to ask that you check it out for the purpose of this post (and I am embedding it here for your convenience).

When I listen to The Beatles’ version, I hear the end of the band. I hate to say that, because The Beatles’ material among their last three/four albums are my favorite from the band’s entire career, but I’m being honest. I hear their no-longer-togetherness in the production, of so many important parts of this song being recorded literally separately and overdubbed. And maybe my comparison for the sake of this post won’t land quite the same way because, in this case, I’m comparing Fanny’s live version of this song to The Beatles’ studio recording of it (since they never played it live), but trust me when I say that doing this is better…because if I compared The Beatles’ version of it to Fanny’s studio version of it, my comparison would be so much worse than it already is (for The Beatles; not for Fanny).

Listening to The Beatles’ version of this song, besides sounding detached, it strikes me how clinical it sounds. Maybe part of it is the production, but it sounds sterile – way too sanitary and overly polished for the lyrical AND musical thematic content of the song. It just doesn’t work quite as well as it could have, had it been more of a group/team effort in recording it.

Now, to finally address the version of this song that I posted and mentioned first – Fanny’s version of this song – I’m going to try to avoid reiterating my favorite thing about their version of this song (the extra verse they added in, which they got permission from the ex-Beatles themselves to add). Focusing on this particular live version of it, let’s talk about the way it opens – slowly, with Nickey Barclay’s piano not quite touching the main riff that opens The Beatles’ version, and June Millington’s fuzzed out guitar building toward the first verse.

Not only do Fanny purposefully choose not to introduce the song with its recognizable intro riff (which most people, whether they’re familiar with The Beatles’ music or not, can probably acknowledge as something they’ve heard before at the very least), but by letting its intro build slowly, they literally give the song space to distinguish itself from the original version. You’ll probably also notice that the pacing of Fanny’s live version drags a little bit, but that’s only a critique afforded to this live version. In spite of that, you know what else I hear in this live version that’s far – vastly – different from The Beatles’ version? Life. By god, I hear life. This song is living, breathing! Don’t you know the slower pace is just its heartbeat, steady and patiently willing to fulfill its lyrics’ very promise: “If you’re lonely, you can talk to me”?

And in that vein, something I believe I have talked about before, is that is how and why this song succeeds (far better than The Beatles’ version ever did) – because the way Fanny plays this song is honestly, graciously, and openly inviting discussion. “If you’re lonely, you can talk to me,” because “I know just what it’s like to listen to my fears,” and “You think you’re going/But you haven’t got a ride” (bolded lyrics and last quoted lyrics are Fanny’s revision and Fanny’s original verse, respectively); in spite of John Lennon’s dark and unsettling lyrics, Fanny’s version is championing empathy. Even Barclay’s adorably ad-libbed “Come on, bulldog! Dry your feet now!” is offering space for patience and empathy.

Somehow, too, I find that June Millington’s guitar solo is more vivacious, more realistic, and in that regard more interesting thematically for the song than John Lennon’s George Harrison’s whichever Beatle actually played it the original version’s solo which is fittingly volatile but only underpins what we already know and understand about/in the song. The lively nature of Millington’s guitar solo seems to indicate this idea that, ‘in spite of all of this paranoia and self doubt and also maybe the dark, vaguely threatening tone of my guitar, I’m open-minded.’ The riff with which it fades into the outro works similarly, but as a steady reinforcement that it’s true – that it’s being honest. Maybe that sounds crazy and unrealistic, because how the fuck do instruments sound like they’re telling the truth versus lying, but surely it also comes down to musicianship. And there is little to no dishonesty in June Millington’s guitar playing ever. And I would be remiss not to mention that the rest of the band’s musicianship reflects similarly, and if it didn’t, this version would sound a lot more like The Beatles’ version than it does, so: Fanny’s “Hey Bulldog” would certainly not succeed as well as it does without the essential rhythmic melody of Nickey Barclay’s piano (the piano riff, which this song was originally built around), nor the steady and groovy support of Jean Millington’s basslines or Alice de Buhr’s unwavering timing and straight-ahead, badass drumming, without which this song’s heartbeat would have very little heart, let alone a beat! Simply stated, if it were not for all of these elements working together honestly and empathetically (and also: joyously! You can tell in the performance that they’re all having fun! Try not to judge de Buhr, though; that’s just her usual intense face of concentration, which I love), it would not have that necessary tone of a collective effort. And that’s the tone that was missing from the original version all along: the tone of collectiveness!

Fanny’s version of this song is everything the song should have been. And if you haven’t heard Fanny’s studio version of “Hey Bulldog” off of their astounding album Fanny Hill (1972), I say to you: good luck. I find it difficult to restrain myself from listening to it on repeat for four hours minimum. Aren’t we lucky that it had the consolation of existing, after all!

“We Were All Wounded at Wounded Knee” Song Analysis

A screenshot from my other blog: Anonymous asked: Hi! Just saw your post about Redbone and wanted to say I’d really love to hear your detailed thoughts on “We Were All Wounded at Wounded Knee” and Redbone in general 💙
For reference, and so maybe you can listen to it while reading this analysis, here is a video of the studio version of the song that I base my analysis on!

The first time I heard “We Were All Wounded at Wounded Knee” by Redbone in May of 2020, I wondered where the song had been all my life. I knew Redbone’s [greatest] hit “Come and Get Your Love”, which is on my anti-depression/happy/upbeat songs playlist, but it took me a long time to finally discover much more of Redbone’s music. But the first time I heard “We Were All Wounded at Wounded Knee”, I thought, ‘Oh, what the fuck! A song about the TRUTH, finally!’ Yeah, maybe my finally! thought was nearly 50 years too late, but I thought that even if I’d had the chance to hear that song while I was in public school, learning about the full breadth of colonization’s harms when America was ‘discovered’ (which I didn’t learn until college) would have prepared me so much earlier for learning that later on – and yes, the knowledge of the real, honest history of America is painful, but at the same time it gives me hope that I can do better, with this knowledge of the pastI can make choices that are properly informed so that we do not repeat history, and I can only hope that the choices I make serve as an example of how to encourage a more respectful, less oppressive future for the country (people, land, water, communities) I call home.

That being said,“We Were All Wounded At Wounded Knee”, a song so politically and musically important [that it was blacklisted by the U.S. basically before it was ever even released as a single] deserves historical context before I delve into any sort of analysis of it. So please respect the journey through American history that is necessary to embark on in order to best understand what this song is all about!

Now, we will get to the historical context of the song right after this, but to keep the historical context fresh right before I get into the analysis of the song, I’d like to present some background information on the creation and release of “We Were All Wounded at Wounded Knee” first – background information on it as a single, and as the final song on side one of the album Wovoka (1973). I found this Youtube video where Pat Vegas [this song’s primary songwriter from the band] talks about the story behind this song: “I got together with a friend of mine named Sandy Baron, and we set up, and in five days, we wrote the lyrics, we put the music together, got the record pressed, and got it out. … But in [the U.S.], CBS says, ‘Nope, we don’t want it, we will not release it, we won’t touch it.’ I said, ‘Fine.’ So I snuck in to the Santa Ana plant where CBS prints the records, and I had 500 [singles, and paid for them to be] made, and I carried the 500 [singles] under my arm to Europe, ’cause I felt, you know, maybe Europe will feel different. And sure enough, it became the biggest record of the year!” Furthermore, “We Were All Wounded At Wounded Knee” was ONLY EVER on the U.K. version of Wovoka; no other released versions of Wovoka include the song, and I infer that is because the song was already successfully released as a single in Europe, and because the record company (CBS, which was originally Columbia Records, was bought by Sony in 1990, and then CBS was renamed Sony Music Entertainment in 1991; Sony Music Entertainment then split European operations into two separate labels – Epic Records and Columbia Records – so Wovoka and the single were originally released by the label that is currently known as Epic Records) had already refused to release the single in the U.S. (or anywhere, honestly – Pat Vegas singlehandedly did the work of promoting the single by taking the pressings to Europe, meaning that if he or the band hadn’t done that, the record company would have never done ANYTHING to release, let alone promote, the single, so the record company wasn’t about to include the song on an official album release, either). In my research on Discogs.com, it appeared that the ONLY publishing company that enabled the song to be released on Wovoka was April Music Ltd. (which was the same U.K. company that published the single), a company in the U.K. (that was renamed CBS Songs Inc. in 1983, then re-incorporated as a separate entity in 1996, then renamed in 2019 to ‘Universal Music Neighbouring Rights Limited’; which is to say, that all happened well after the release of Wovoka) so it’s almost singularly thanks to April Music Ltd./EMI April Music Inc. for its inclusion on ANY album release of Wovoka at all.

Now for the historical context of the song, the title of “We Were All Wounded At Wounded Knee” evokes two separate incidents in American history, both called Wounded Knee but with each of their own, historically specific titles – the Wounded Knee Massacre (1890), and the Wounded Knee Occupation (1973). Most importantly, the song is about the Wounded Knee Massacre, but with the very recent incident of the Wounded Knee Occupation (which started on February 27, 1973; the single was released in May, 1973, and Wovoka was recorded in June and October of 1973 and released in November, 1973), the band capitalized on the incident’s press being in the public’s consciousness to call back to the original event at Wounded Knee, which I’d suggest was a way to reinforce how history repeats itself. The song is, of course, mostly about the Wounded Knee Massacre, and if you don’t know anything about it, I’ll try to sum it up briefly before you go on to do your own research about it: the Wounded Knee Massacre (also known as the Battle of Wounded Knee) took place on December 29, 1890, near Wounded Knee Creek on the Lakota Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota. The Battle is better known as a Massacre because it wasn’t much of fair battle between the combined group of Miniconjou and Hunkpapa Lakota and (as the song names specifically) the U.S. 7th Cavalry Regiment – when the 7th Cavalry went in to disarm the Lakota during a forced confinement to Wounded Knee Creek (the disarming of which was preceded by the ignorant troops witnessing the Lakota performing the rituals of the “Ghost Dance,” which was started by Wovoka – hence the album title! – and perceived it as a threat [of violence by the Lakota]). When a deaf Miniconjou Lakota man, Black Coyote’s, gun allegedly went off as the troops attempted to take it, the Regiment opened fire on the Lakota (many of whom had already been disarmed – as I mentioned, it was not a fair fight). About 250-300 Lakota were murdered, with 51 injured (some of whom died later), and 25 soldiers were killed with 39 wounded (6 of whom died later – critical thinking moment: why is there a specific number of “later on” deaths of [presumably white] American soldiers, while there isn’t a specific number of later deaths for the Lakota?). The Ghost Dance also deserves some additional context, which might also explain some other lyric references: briefly, the Ghost Dance was started by Northern Paiute spiritual leader Wovoka, who claimed that the ritual of the dance (which blended a messianic form of Christianity with traditional Native beliefs) would end settler colonialism, reunite the living with the spirits of the dead, and that in doing so, the dead would fight on behalf of the living; and apparently the Lakota’s version of the Ghost Dance was more millenariastic than Wovoka’s original version – the Lakota’s Ghost Dance, in addition to including Wovoka’s original teachings, appeared to more specifically promise that the colonizers would vanish and that the bison would return. But overall, the general idea of the Ghost Dance was to bring peace (to all), prosperity, and unity to the Native people throughout the region (x). And I would like to stress that, overall, the Lakotas performed the Ghost Dance as a method of survival.

For my critique and analysis of the song, I will: share my thoughts on the structure of the song, contextualize the lyrics when and where necessary (or refer back to where I already did), analyze the lyrics, and of course talk about the music itself!

To begin, let’s talk about the way the song opens – right away with the chorus! And, in fact, right before the lyrics of the chorus starts, the song is introduced with a light piano and drum combo which tapers off into a steady drumbeat (employing techniques of traditional Native drum music) as the vocals come in with: “We were all wounded at Wounded Knee/You and me/We were all wounded at Wounded Knee/You and me/In the name of Manifest Destiny/You and me/You and me/You and me…” It’s so noteworthy to mention when the instrumentation and vocals come in exactly as they repeat the line “We were all wounded at Wounded Knee,” as though to reinforce the togetherness of the statement (“all”) with the full force of the band (instruments and ALL of the glorious harmonies!). The hot-as-hell funky electric guitar riff coming in during the intro chorus, then pausing during the drum break toward the end of the chorus (the drumbreak was also a very good choice as the classic drumroll musically evokes a march) for “We were all[/not] wiped out by the 7th Cavalry” and coming back in after “Cavalry” to support the statement of the lyric is also a really great choice musically and definitely shows off a major characteristic of the Wovoka album overall! Onward, I wouldn’t want to gloss over “We were all wounded at Wounded Knee/You and me/In the name of Manifest Destiny/You and me”. If you don’t know what Manifest Destiny is, it is simply the whole basis/justification that the U.S. used for western colonization and expansion. I think: honestly, Redbone could have said anything about Manifest Destiny, but you know what they did instead? They highlighted the harm it caused TO “YOU AND ME”! And while I do believe that Redbone are talking to each other and/or other Native people specifically when they sing “We were all wounded at Wounded Knee/You and me,” I don’t think they would have been so general in their word choice of “We were all wounded at Wounded Knee” – because non-Native people (colonizers, in fact) were involved in the Wounded Knee Massacre and the Wounded Knee Occupation, too, weren’t they? (Yes, yes they were.) And when Redbone sings “We were all wounded at Wounded Knee/You and me”, I will point out that they’re singing to an audience – an audience (the “you”) which they were aware of, and probably ideally HOPED (if I may insert my own colonial assumption there) – that was not all Native. This might also be my own colonial judgment and assumption, but considering the very general/broad word-choice for their audience, I get the sense that, in this chorus, Redbone intentionally propose that colonialism (what Manifest Destiny justified) harms EVERYONE, and it works overall as a chorus to suggest that colonialism is the root of how and why [American] history repeats itself – an idea made all the more genius considering the inherently repetitive nature of a chorus in the first place.

Now, if the chorus as the intro didn’t pack enough of a punch, the second verse comes in with plenty of groovy instrumentation but just Pat Vegas singing lead as he continues to present the real history – the truth – of the Wounded Knee Massacre (and beyond that one incident, too; another genius credit to them, and an F, zero credit to the American government): “They made us many promises/But always broke their word/They penned us in like buffalo/Drove us like a herd/And finally on the reservation/We were going for our preservation/We were all wiped out by the 7th Cavalry”. The first two lines do not just discuss past history, but proof of the current and ongoing colonial project that the American government STILL enacts to this day (see: ICWA & Haaland v. Brackeen), so in that way, I’m sorry to estimate, the song aged poorly. The similes in the third and fourth lines are great to showcase two different historical references, one being the U.S. Military’s unofficial but active attempt to force the Native populations (who relied on the buffalo) into assimilation by murdering the buffalo into extinction (assimilation tactics which also included displacing, or “penning in” the tribes to government-specified reservations), and I would theorize that the other reference is to the Ghost Dance that the Lakota performed pre-Wounded Knee Massacre which the Lakota hoped (in performing the dance properly) would bring back the buffalo (among other reasons I mentioned earlier). The rest of the verse, of course, explicitly refers to the Wounded Knee Massacre, including pre-massacre, and the Lakota tribe’s attempt to evade the U.S. Military’s enforcement to confine the tribe to their government-appointed village on the reservation.

The next verse presents a hopefulness that, I feel, deeply permeates the entire song as a whole and transforms it positively from a song that arguably just admonishes the harms of colonialism (not that, I personally feel, that is a bad thing! It is a worthy topic of discussion, probably more so now than it was then and the band even makes a great argument for that!). “Now we make our promises/We won’t break our word/We’ll sing, sing, sing out our story ’til the message is heard/There’s a whole new generation/Braves who dream of veneration/Who were not wiped out by the 7th Cavalry/You and me, you and me”. With this verse, the band [as Native people] promise that they’ll keep singing and telling their story – the message of the song (which is, arguably, that colonialism harms everyone) – and that they have hope, too, because new generations of Native people will ideally experience the respect they greatly deserve, and they will not be actively colonized and slaughtered en mass. The fact that this verse also ends with the repeated “You and me, you and me” lyric seems to imply that “you and me” are also meant to be part of that “whole new generation … who were not wiped out by the 7th Cavalry,” which begs the question again of who is the audience of this song? With the inclusion of the specified title for Native warriors “who dream of veneration,” I would assume that they are specifically talking to and about Native people here, but is that then the case for the rest of the song? Contextually-speaking, I think it’s safe to say that the band’s #1 intended audience are Native people – an example of “by us, for us” – but as a nationally and, at that point (with the release of the song as a single and its particular success in Europe), internationally-known band, their audience needed to expand in order to impart their message to as many people as possible, including people who need to hear it for different reasons (Native people, for representation and to hear their experiences reflected in a widely-heard song, and non-Native people, for awareness of the harm they may directly or indirectly have a hand in). In other words, yes, this song was written specifically with Native people in mind, but to pigeonhole it as a piece of media that only concerned Native people would grossly neglect all who have ever been and are involved in issues which [negatively] impact and exacerbate “Native issues,” and to impart and exemplify what that means, I include myself as a non-Native person who needs to hear this song and understand its thematic scope so I may apply that understanding to my interactions with my community (people, land, animals, and water). Continuing on with the lyric analysis, I also feel it’s important to point out that with the role-reversal of the lyrics “Now we make our promises/We won’t break our word” – which is, as a means of turning the table, aimed at the government – we, as the audience, of non-Native and Native people alike, are not meant to take that as a threat, and if any member of the audience who is not part of the government feels threatened by such a line, those threatened feelings inherently come from a place of privilege; if one (who was not part of the government) were to hear or read it as a threat, it would be because one’s government which has made promises to one and failed to keep those promises has not been a threat to one [ultimately, one’s way of life]. Finally, I want to point out a difference between the studio version that I listened to and based this article on and the live version that can be heard elsewhere, when the distinctions between them lyrically happen most obviously during this verse: on the studio version, the (heard – not usually written) lyrics remain as “We will sing, sing, sing out our story ’til the message is heard,” but on the live version (and apparently in the single’s written lyrics), Pat Vegas specifically sings “We will sing … out our story ’til the truth is heard,” and I feel these distinctions desperately deserve to be addressed! The difference in the lyric “’til the message is heard” on the studio version, to me, sounds softened; the impact of it is literally softened because – stay with me here – a message can be anything, which is to say that a message does not inherently have to contain or include a fact, or the truth. The live version’s lyric revision of “’til the truth is heard” is much more impactful, because the truth must always contain a fact, as a fact must always define the truth. So, my primary criticism for the whole song (the studio version), I must say, is that they did not initially go full-impact on what they recorded versus what they performed live, and I think it’s a bit silly that they didn’t sing “’til the truth is heard” all along considering the fact that the record company refused to release the song as a single or on the album in the first place and the U.S. blacklisted the song regardless – if the band wanted the full breadth of this song’s impact to be heard and felt and recognized in the first place, since Pat Vegas specifically went out of his way to get this song played anyway, it would have been better to name the point of the song in the studio version all along as he did in the live version anyway.

As for the final chorus, this is what allows the song to follow through with its effective structure, and it is also arguably the most ‘controversial’ part of the song because it appeals to the idea of truth as as a belief now instead of what is factual as the rest of the song accomplishes. Again, it goes: “We were all wounded at Wounded Knee/You and me/We were all wounded at Wounded Knee/You and me/We were all wounded… By Wounded Knee”. In case you forgot the shimmering vocal arrangement, and the all-at-once beautiful and funky instrumental of the chorus, they weren’t about to let you down in the outro…nor would they forget the intention of their message TRUTH! or let you forget it, either. The instrumental of the song fades as the harmonized vocals sing the final “We were all wounded” and poignantly ends with a delicately slow guitar strum as Pat Vegas finishes the line with an important revision: “[We were all wounded]…by Wounded Knee,” followed by the characteristic steady drumbeat that basically opened the song as well. This subtle revision does so much for the song, not to mention how it literally ends with this (forcing the listener to remember it most clearly), because it’s as though Pat Vegas asserts his earlier promise to “sing out our story ’til the message is heard” – the message TRUTH here is, finally, that they were not all just factually wounded at Wounded Knee (also known as a historical example of genocidal techniques and persecution justified by colonialism), but that they truthfully suffered because of it – that they still suffer from knowing it happened and, MORE IMPORTANTLY, that conditions (promises! Treaties! Land and water rights and protections! Adhering to the law? How many other ways can I describe it?!) have not really improved since then, seeing as, specifically at the time of the song’s release, history had repeated itself in the name of the Wounded Knee Occupation (or, aptly, Second Wounded Knee).

When considering everything they managed to fit in this song, it’s so admirable to me that they contained so much truth in this fairly short (under 3 minutes and 20 seconds) song. In my estimation, if this song is about anything – history, or Native rights or Native activism, or colonialism, or truth – I think it’s overall best defined as a song about truth. To be purposely subjective here now, that’s what some of the best art is – truth is one of the most qualifying, deserving, worthwhile subjects to explore in art, particularly as an artist, but it can be that way for the audience/consumer, too. Redbone showed us what the art of the truth sounds like.

I also reference “the live version” of the song in my analysis, so I also wanted to share the video of the live version that contains a lyric revision different from the studio version!

The Glow of NYE 2019

This was the second year in a row that I headed to The Showbox on New Year’s Eve to see Thunderpussy and their influential multi-band lineups, but what made it better this year was that I got to bring along one of my best friends. While I won’t EVER knock going to concerts alone (which is something I did for the first time last year and have continued to do several times), I do understand why going with friends – especially very good ones – is such a special experience. Plus, my friend helped me remember to breathe when we walked into the area designated for the VIP party and I found myself just feet away from four musical goddesses.

Oh yes, there was a VIP party! From my understanding (perhaps assumption), it was the first one Thunderpussy had hosted for fans, and I saw it as another step toward their increasing popularity and success. But then again, it wasn’t hard to get into – I hastened to download their new app as soon as I found out about it and became a member of ‘Club Pussy’ (I’m only a free member, but hopefully not for long!), and a few days before the show Molly Sides posted that there were still spots open for the VIP party and to just inform them of one’s name. I told them my name and my friend’s (since I knew he’d be coming with me to the show) and they confirmed our access to the party. I appreciated how simple it was, though I doubt it’ll be that easy in the future. But I do love them for it!

So, as soon as my friend and I arrived at the venue (a little bit late, but amazingly I wasn’t so anxious about it – ANOTHER PLUS FOR HAVING A FRIEND THERE!) and checked in for the party, we walked through to the allocated area and my heart and social anxiety remembered as a delayed reaction that four members of my current favorite band were here and I could TALK TO THEM. I noticed Molly Sides first, dressed in an elegant furry-looking black-and-white checked dress and chatting with people, and I grabbed my friend’s arm and whisper-squeaked out, “Oh god, I’M FORGETTING HOW TO BREATHE!” And less than a minute after I said it and we fellow introverts inched close to a corner of the bar/socializing area, another possible introvert with long brown hair approached us who I recognized as Thunderpussy’s new drummer, who I had yet to see them live with. Lindsey Elias, who acted nearly as awkward as I felt (which actually helped put me at ease, don’t get me wrong), asked us how many shows we’d been to and if we’d seen the band during any of their traditional NYE shows at The Showbox. Though I’d wanted to say something to her about how much I was looking forward to seeing her with them, I couldn’t think of any way to encourage her without making it sound like I was skeptical (and because I’m still such a huge fan of Thunderpussy-established drummer Ruby Dunphy), so unfortunately I wasn’t able to reassure her as a new band member which I quickly felt she might’ve appreciated when she first approached us. Still, I appreciated that she came up to us, and she was very nice!

As my heart hummed with happiness at the knowledge that I’d now met one member of Thunderpussy, my mind was screaming about the fact that guitarist Whitney Petty and bassist Leah Julius were just a little ways away, and if my friend and I removed ourselves from our introvert corner and looked more approachable (oops – my shyness fault), we could probably talk to them. I was especially excited (and dying) to meet and talk with Julius who, just by observed social media presence, I felt a kinship with unlike any of the other members. Once my friend and I inched our way over to a table where snack foods were set out and we waited until her attention was no longer distracted by anyone else, we finally got our chance to talk to her. It amazed me (and flattered me, and I was screaming on the inside like you would not believe) that the first thing she said to me was, “You look familiar, I feel like I’ve seen you before.” And she probably had considering I stood at her feet in March in my current town of residence, and my friend and I had been very close to the stage at Seattle Pride Fest when they played there in June. So I explained that she might have, because this was my fourth time seeing them. And then my friend and I explained where we’d come from to see this show, and she related about the show in March – which I told her I was at and how much I appreciated that they played there since it’s where I live. (I also told her shamelessly that it was my favorite concert I’d ever been to, which was true and might actually still be true, lineup and performance-quality considered.) We chatted for a little bit longer, but ultimately her attention was pulled away by another fan who wanted their photograph of the band signed, so my friend and I inched away again and caught sight of guitarist Whitney Petty.

What still surprises me about meeting Whitney Petty is that the first thing she did when she saw me was say “Come on, get in here,” and motioned for me to hug her. All she did was notice me and requested that I hug her. While I’d been privy before to the generosity/sympathy of musicians who’ve hugged me when they noticed how nervous yet appreciative of their music I am (*cough* Ann and Nancy Wilson *cough*), for some reason I had not at all expected Petty to react to me on-sight like that. But I appreciated it, and hugged her, and then she asked us our names. (LOL) I made sure to quote her about how rock n’ roll is not dead (although I didn’t add, and maybe should have, that I personally think that’s thanks to Thunderpussy and some of my other favorite bands of all women) and we three shared our enthusiasm about that night’s show that was then barely an hour away from starting. My friend also got two pictures of me with her which I am still floating (glowing!!!!) about:

Ah yes, the typical excited guitarist face. And me who will never stop being a wholesome geek, apparently.
Whitney Petty and me! ISN’T SHE SO SWEET. AND I’M SO EXCITED.

The doors opened soon after we met Petty, so my friend and I sadly had to concede that we would not get to meet Molly Sides. Still, I was so grateful that I even got to meet three out of four of them that it was better than I could’ve imagined.

A little bit before the show started (luckily enough – probably mostly having to do with the fact that my friend was with me so I had someone to chat with – the time between the doors opening and the show starting seemed to pass very quickly), I was fortunate [and forward] enough to catch Leah Julius as she was walking across the GA floor, so I asked her if it was okay if I got a picture with her, and she very graciously (in her easygoing way that I totally relate to) obliged as my friend got one of us:

Me with Leah Julius! P.S. I fucking love her coat.

The fact that I had most recently gotten a photo with Julius was not my justification for choosing to face and stand by her side of the stage – actually, it was because I wanted to change where I stood from last year (which had been facing Petty’s side of the stage)! Fortunately, my friend and I staked out our place near the stage on the right side and stayed there for the entire concert period.

A couple months before the concert, I’d looked up the bands playing because I wanted to be prepared unlike last year, but I discovered that I couldn’t find much info about or music by Trash Fire, so I pretty much had no idea what to expect besides what I could assume from their band name (LOL). So when they came on and started playing, I immediately said to my friend: “Oh, okay, so they’re a punk band.” The main thing I have to say about them is that I’ve heard a lot of local punk and hardcore-type bands (local to my city community, at least) and a lot of them have pretty much sounded the same. And Trash Fire was no different. Which is to say I was not impressed or particularly excited by their music, either musically or lyrically. But one thing to note: I did appreciate one song’s lyrics about “You can love who you want/Fuck who you want,” (ignoring the fact that the next lyric was ironically “DIE“), but at the same time I can’t appreciate a song that says “Fuck who you want” in such a brazen manner without also clarifying “But get consent.” I told my friend this and he said, “Well, I think it’s assumed…” which I understood, but my point still remains that the message “Fuck who you want” isn’t significant enough without clarifying that you shouldn’t just fuck who you want without getting consent (because then that’s not fucking – that’s rape. Full stop! No motherfucking arguments allowed! And yes, I will be punk about it if you won’t!). It was fun to see Whitney Petty and Molly Sides come out in the audience to dance and watch Trash Fire, though – it made it even more clear to me how dedicated they are to supporting other artists, which is [subjectively?] what GREAT artists do.

As I’d mentioned, I’d listened to one or two songs by Constant Lovers, so I was prepared to at least be interested in their music, and my interest turned out to be pretty legit! Musically, I enjoyed their set, although it seemed a little pretentious that the lead vocalist used a couple of drums, a guitar, and a saxophone at least once during their set, and I say that because I didn’t think it was clear that he was actually good at playing all three instruments or at least passionate about each instrument. Don’t get me wrong – I understand DIY approaches to music, but usually passion makes up for lack of real skill, and unfortunately it felt more like ‘Look at all the instruments I can play like a real multi-instrumentalist’ instead of ‘I’m using all of these instruments to make the music better.’ Also, I could not understand even two words that the lead vocalist sang (screamed? Sometimes screamed. I always know when guys are screaming because I hate music where guys are screaming) let alone full sentences or lyrics, so that was also a let-down in finding out how much I could like their music; I’m not sure if that was a sound/technical issue, though, or if the vocalist really just was not enunciating at all. The band as a whole was good, though, and I liked that their music did seem to be doing something different and interesting which is basically what I look for in music now.

After Constant Lovers’ set was over, a person in the audience who later introduced herself as Amy asked me if I was excited to see Bear Axe and I told her I was, and she admitted “75% of why I’m here is Shaina Shepherd” which surprised me a bit because 85% of why I was there was for Thunderpussy. I thought it exemplified why actually talking to people at concerts could turn out so interesting, especially at multi-band-lineup shows (which is mostly a reminder to myself as a shy introvert to try harder!). So I explained to her that I’d seen Shepherd perform as a guest vocalist with The Black Tones and Thunderpussy at last year’s New Year’s Eve show, and since then I’d listened to Bear Axe and enjoyed their music a bit so I was excited to actually see Bear Axe. Luckily, my excitement was justified!

I was quite amused to realize that Bear Axe were still soundchecking in front of everyone by covering the song “I Want Candy” – it was funny because we all thought they were starting their set, but they were still soundchecking! The experiment turned out fruitful, though, because I thought their set was nearly flawless sound-quality-and-technically-wise.

Apparently prior to the show I hadn’t listened to their music enough to remember it all, but I did remember the song “Uber” (mostly because I wasn’t a fan of it, heh) and recognized it when Shepherd began singing it. Though I wasn’t otherwise able to remember or properly identify what songs they played, I want to stress how much fucking FUN their performance was from start to finish. Even songs whose studio versions that I vaguely remembered and knew that I hadn’t been a fan of culminated into an AMAZINGLY vibrant, kick-ass performance. Honestly, I was rocking out and enjoying myself and the music so much that I wondered afterward if I had even watched half of their set (because my eyes were closed and I was feeling it – YOU KNOW!).

By the time their set was almost over, I both didn’t want it to end and I was still excited to see Thunderpussy, which just ended up as a shit-ton of excitement and I couldn’t stop smiling. I also remembered seeing a post on Instagram from Shepherd a little while before the concert about Heather Thomas guesting on drums, so I wasn’t surprised but I was excited when she came on for the penultimate song of their set, along with hip-hop artist Terry Monstrosity. And let me say that while I was not expecting a hip-hop collaboration during Bear Axe’s set, I was not at all disappointed and I enjoyed the music quite a bit!

The highlight of their set for me, though, was the their last song when Shepherd brought on her friend and fellow artist TeZATalks and also introduced guitarist Kathy Moore (who audience member Amy had told me about before their set which I’m still super grateful for!), and they began to cover the Beatles’ “Blackbird.” I can’t lie – it was so beautiful that I started crying as soon as they started singing. I also made a mental note to remember TeZATalks because she and Shepherd really did the song and its spirit justice. But I was not expecting that immediately after they finished the Beatles’ cover, they started in on a song I didn’t recognize but finally, eventually realized was a cover of Soundgarden’s “Black Hole Sun.” (I’ve tried listening to Soundgarden – operative word there being “tried.” I still can’t. Sorry!) Despite my embarrassment of not knowing the song, it was an awesome experience to hear and see the band perform it and to hear the crowd throughout the room singing along. After all, an ideal concert will always have some audience participation, so that was TRULY ideal and amazing to witness.

Overall, Bear Axe were simply an incredible collection of musicians, and it was THE BEST THING to see them all enjoying themselves on stage – after all, that’s half the reason people go to see live music. Shaina Shepherd totally blew me away with how exciting she was as a frontperson and what an AMAZING vocalist she was, not to mention how utterly effortless she made it look. Let me say: the parts of their set that I do remember watching, I was thinking how happy I felt to get to experience this band’s awesomeness, and that was considering that I was still mostly there and excited to see Thunderpussy. But Bear Axe’s effort on stage honestly made me forget that sometimes, hence my simply-felt happiness when I watched them.

Finally, when Thunderpussy graced the stage at 15 minutes to the New Year countdown, I was transfixed (though had grown accustomed to this feature) by the dancers who slunk onstage after Whitney Petty. I assumed that Molly Sides was among the dancers, but because I was not facing the proper side of the stage, I missed when she was revealed amongst them except when raised screams went out through the crowd. Tantalizingly slowly, the band seemed to break into a new song – very atmospheric and interesting – that I hadn’t heard before, but it soon enough morphed into “Velvet Noose” which sounded amazing as ever as one of my favorite Thunderpussy songs. Immediately after the end of the song, they began the countdown to the new year which started with oodles of confetti, sharing some champagne with each other and a few lucky audience members, and an overall lovely camaraderie between the whole band on stage. After a few joyful minutes of celebration, as Lindsey Elias and Leah Julius began to head back to pick up their instruments (and smoke a little, which amused me!), Sides took that time to explain the symbolism of their costumes and the theme of the show (‘The Neon Glow of Electric Sax’); Sides gave a shoutout to Thunderpussy’s costume designer Pakio Galore for making their highlighter-bright, glow-in-the-dark outfits for the night, and she explained: ‘We all have a brightness within us, and we should all use it to carry us through this new decade.’ It was a coincidence that I felt like I was glowing on the inside, myself, after having met, talked a bit with, and hugged three of the four members of Thunderpussy prior to the show. Personally, I’ve been reminded by many people throughout my short life that there’s a guiding light within me that I must always remember to use, but I appreciated so much that Thunderpussy presented that idea for everyone to consider, verbally and visually.

Just like last year, Sides also inspired us to turn to the people around us and introduce ourselves, which is how I officially learned fan Amy’s name, along with a woman named Hannah in front of me who complimented me on the Totoro sweater I was wearing, and I got an enthusiastic hug from a young woman beside me who didn’t end up introducing herself (but I failed to introduce myself as well – oops). Sides’ demonstration gave me a rush of affection for her and the rest of the band and their motivation to reinforce this lovely concept of human connection. And then they kicked into “Thunderpussy” – because what other fucking song deserves to be the first one to initiate the new year?

After their unsurprisingly badass performance of their self-titled song, they played a new song I hadn’t heard before. It was infectious to jam out to, of course, and I recall the lyrics mentioned something about “put your hands on me” which seemed in line for a Thunderpussy song (sincerely, not sarcastically). They next went into “Never Know” which I was excited for beyond measure because I had ALREADY predicted that this song would (should) become one of their new live staples, and they only proved to me why.

Then, to my surprise (as I’d wondered aloud to my friend before their set what songs they would cover), they started out slowly with the guitar riff to Aerosmith’s “Sweet Emotion” as Molly chatted with the crowd. Of course the cover was badass, because how could Thunderpussy cover Aerosmith and have it NOT be badass? Rhetorical question.

An interesting move to me, they next played “The Cloud” which Sides endearingly dedicated to the crowd and which caused me to PROMPTLY dissolve into tears as the song began. As I told the band on Twitter, I am physically incapable of resisting breaking down into sobs whenever they play that song, because the opening lines of it just touch my soul in a way I’m not sure I’ll ever get over. So of course I continued to cry throughout the entire song while my friend nudged me a couple of times in solidarity which I understood because what the fuck else are you supposed to do when your friend dissolves into tears on cue with the music at a rock concert? And it’s funny to know it truly is that song that has such a powerful effect on me, because I’m able to stop crying by the end of it almost as immediately.

It was lucky I stopped crying so quickly, though, because their next song was another new one, and a hard-rocker. Memorably, it seemed to be about fire-breathing and rock n’ roll (although I don’t remember if Sides sang specifically about a fire-breathing dragon or if she was making a metaphor about fire-breathing rock n’ roll?). The song seemed fitting though, as I’d talked to Whitney Petty earlier about how rock n’ roll was alive and well, which is to say that if rock n’ roll breathes fire at all (and to say that it still does), it’s coming from the fire of Thunderpussy. (…irony intended.)

Apparently this setlist bookended their new fire-breathing hard rock song with their softer tunes, as the next song they played was “On the Line.” In preparation for it, Petty wielded an acoustic guitar and Elias and Julius left the stage, so “On the Line” was an extremely intimate performance between Petty’s guitar and Sides’ beautiful siren-esque voice as they played the exquisite love song. Plus it became so quiet during their performance (to hear the guitar, I’d wager, and because it was clearly a vulnerable performance) that I was able to actually understand pretty much all of the lyrics, which gave me an even deeper appreciation for the song.

But the band were not finished surprising me, because after “On the Line,” once Elias and Julius and their dancers returned to the stage, they started playing A MEDLEY of THEIR OWN SONGS. Which is to say they began with the beginning of “Speed Queen,” roared into “Fever,” and finished off with the swelling “Torpedo Love,” playing a third or so of each song until “Torpedo Love” which they played the most of. Unfortunately – though it still ended up sounding kind of cool – Petty’s guitar (a Gibson SG which I hadn’t seen her play before! New guitar, I guess?) was experiencing some technical difficulties, so they played the entire bit of “Speed Queen” with only the drums marking the beat, the bass carrying the melody, and Sides singing as though nothing was wrong, which was a formidable feat as far as I was concerned. Luckily Petty’s guitar started working again by “Fever” and we were treated properly to their medley. I’m still shocked by their decision to do that – although I understood it was to save time, I usually think of medleys played as covers and not purposefully by the original band. But it was cool, and I only hope that the next time I see them there won’t be any technical difficulties and we’ll get to enjoy the badassery that is “Speed Queen” (and hopefully in its entirety?). “Torpedo Love” was also a memorable performance because they started it not at the gentle and steady beginning, but toward the middle, essentially unleashing its most rock n’ roll energy to conclude their medley.

Finally they played “Powerhouse,” which I had been DYING to hear as played with Elias on drums (rather than Chad Smith on the studio version). As I mentioned earlier about Bear Axe’s set, the ideal concert will always have some audience participation, so Sides instructed each half of the room to vary the “yeah”s and clapping which open the song (and then, as a soprano, I found myself actually wishing I’d faced Petty’s side of the stage!), and then faded as the song officially began, though started up again in the right place with Sides’ encouragement. Now I get to acknowledge that I TRULY enjoyed this version of “Powerhouse” better than the studio version, thanks to drummer Elias fitting in as I’d hoped with Thunderpussy’s groove (you can’t just replace drummers with any drummer, no matter how good and well-acclaimed/popular they are!). And I should probably say this now, too – I was very proud of how well Elias played with Thunderpussy, and if there was any doubt in my mind before that she fits with them, there is absolutely NONE now. Thunderpussy has gained yet another drum goddess, and that very much pleases me.

Interestingly, they rounded out their set with two new songs that I hadn’t heard before; truthfully, I don’t much remember them, but I enjoyed them due to the sheer joyful energy from the band and the audience. In hindsight, it is kind of funny to me, though, noticing when bands play new songs because there is little crowd participation (such as whoops and whistles and screams) – just purely listening, soaking in the new information of music and lyrics (if applicable). I said it last year, and I’ll say it again this year – that is the joy of loving and becoming a fan of a new[er] band.

When they walked off stage before 1:30am (the time my friend and I knew they were supposed to finish, as we’d seen the schedule posted at the VIP party), my friend apparently wondered if they’d come back at all, which I understood because last year I’d screamed a lot in hopes that they would come back for the encore. This year, though, I knew better, so I tried to save my voice until they came back on – which they did, of course. Petty and Julius threw remaining glow sticks, which had been sitting on stage since before Thunderpussy came on, into the crowd (I’d snatched an orange one during the VIP party and hooked it around my wrist, which you can see in the photo of me with Julius) before they launched into “Trust a Man,” which I’d wondered when they would play! Personally, I liked the symbolism of playing “Trust a Man” as the intro song to their encore. I also remembered that they’d play it at the Seattle Pride Fest show (before it was released on their EP Milk It, even!), and though I enjoyed it more this time because I knew the lyrics and I’ve listened to the studio version A LOT since Milk It came out, I think it has a little ways to go to capture its proper mood – part of me thinks it’s because it lacks the acoustic guitar element which essentially gives it its western-reminiscent sound, but I want to give them more credit considering they only have one guitarist who can only play one guitar at a time. (But a note to Thunderpussy: know that does not mean you have to become like my reigning favorite band Tom Petty and The Heartbreakers, either by adding another slightly unnecessary band member or requiring Molly to play the guitar. YOU DON’T HAVE TO DO IT!) So mostly, I just think it’s a mood thing. Maybe slotting it elsewhere in the set, and not as part of the encore, would help it…maybe playing it alongside the “Firebreather” song, even? Here’s my secret dream/wish: to create a setlist for Thunderpussy.

As for another parallel to last year’s show, they played a cover as the final song of their encore, but this cover REALLY surprised me – Pat Benatar’s “We Belong”! When they started playing it, along with guest guitarist Kathy Moore, somehow I didn’t realize how much of the song’s lyrics I actually remembered until I was singing along basically word-for-word with Sides. But what an amazing experience! I loved how Sides introduced it, too, stressing the importance of connection and that we belong together as people, helping each other out. And though you’d think it’s such a short song and that it couldn’t have been a very long encore if they’d only played those two songs…well, the end of “We Belong” quickly turned into a literal party onstage as Thunderpussy were joined by some of Bear Axe and their guests, the lead vocalist of Constant Lovers, AND a surprise visit from The Black Tones’ Eva Walker! At one point it felt kind of funny to me that I was watching it, though there was plenty of good music happening at the same time, because it started to feel like I was literally watching a party rather than being part of it. But ah, I’m guessing that’s what happens at jam parties. At least I know what one looks like now? In all seriousness, it was fun. And it was charming to be reminded that “We can make each other happy” – as sung by pretty much all of the vocalists at some point during the jam.

So that was definitely one of the best nights of my life – meeting three members of Thunderpussy, watching Bear Axe perform, feeling like Thunderpussy proved yet again why they’re my current favorite band, AND getting to experience all of those things with one of my best friends. How could it have been better? To reinforce the future over the past, that’s rhetorical. As always, I’m stoked for the next opportunity I’ll get to see Thunderpussy, plus I’m officially excited to see Bear Axe again, too. The new decade has been ushered in, and I am fucking READY FOR IT. (The power of Thunderpussy compels me!!)

Linda Ronstadt’s Voice is the Sweetest Gift – So Why Can’t You Appreciate That?

All I did was look up Linda Ronstadt: The Sound of My Voice once and now I’m here, about to rant. So fair warning.

One thing that’s not rant-y: I’m SUPER EXCITED to see the documentary. I adore Linda Ronstadt with all the fangirl love and appreciation possible in my heart. The first song I ever sang at two years old was her version of “Blue Bayou,” and since re-discovering her and listening to most of her discography a few years ago, I am FULL of appreciation for what she’s done as an artist – and what a fucking artist. A multi-genre-wielding singer with a considerate ear (and heart) for the technical like NO OTHER. If you can’t respect her for anything else, I don’t care who you are – you HAVE to respect her for that.

Anyway, before I go off on a tangent…oh wait, that’s what I’m doing here. But not about her art – about a review for this documentary.

What I found in my basic search of the documentary is that some asshole reviewer decided that it was treated too “PC” and the first sentence started with some unnecessary bullshit about “leftist filmmakers.”

Okay okay, I’m going to consider some context before I go full speed ahead: Ronstadt is a country-rock artist primarily, though of course she has her Spanish albums (which are beaut) and jazz, standards, etc. She went everywhere musically because she’s Linda fucking Ronstadt and she could, but first she was known as the queen of country rock. What’s the biggest demographic to like country music, especially in the decades when she was most popular? Hmm wait, lemme guess: WHITE PEOPLE. Tons of snowflake-y white people. Yes, indeed! And that’s probably who feels most protective of her (besides, uh, Latinx people, okay…). I also know this personally because my grandparents are those exact [conservative white] people, and it was my grandfather who taught me to sing “Blue Bayou.”

So obviously this reviewer who decided that the documentary was “PC” made by “leftist filmmakers” is one o’ those special snowflakes who apparently doesn’t even recall that Ronstadt herself has been a liberal since – well, I don’t know, but she’s a fucking liberal is all you need to know. (Oh, also, to make this even better: as a zillennial I discovered that the filmmakers made quite a few LGBTQ-centered films and that at least one of them is gay. Which means “leftist filmmaker” is an innuendo for ‘I’m obviously a homophobe.’ If you don’t want to sound like a bigot, you’d consider your language usage better. But I suppose if you don’t care that you’re a bigot, you wouldn’t care about not sounding like one, either.)

My other problem with the idea of the documentary being “PC” is – oh, you mean it didn’t actually go into the sex and drugs and rockstar vice stereotypes and instead just focused on her art and influence of her art? Oh shit, bro…that sounds like an actual, legitimate documentary of an artist to me.

In other words: this person’s superficial expectations of a rockstar-centric documentary weren’t met, so of course they’d write a senseless “article” about its “PC” tone and “leftist” filmmakers.

I could go further by looking through my feminist lens and examining the fact that this writer with a masculine name, who’s then most likely male, wanted something that validated the male gaze and his, I don’t know, fetishized fascination with her. (A surprise that will come as no surprise: he described her physical appearance in an entire paragraph. Like that fucking mattered. Except – oh wait! She’s female, so of course it matters. Would you dedicate an entire paragraph to what Mick Jagger or Tom Petty looked like for the most successful period of their career? That’s why when I write reviews and shit I don’t say a GOD DAMN WORD about how the artists dress or present themselves unless it’s absolutely relevant, because that’s not what matters to me and frankly I don’t think that’s what should matter to readers, either, if I’m deigning to write about art for art’s sake. And I do prefer to write about art for art’s sake, so if you ever expect anything else besides feminist rants and critiques, hi, goodbye I guess.)

It’s just fucking ironic that he went on this over-saturated tirade about how the film was apparently ‘colored through a PC lens’ but he obviously didn’t pay ANY attention to the whole point of the film; it obviously went RIGHT over his head. In which case I would boldly declare: then maybe the film wasn’t made for him. And that’s exactly where those special snowflakes come from – expecting every-single-god-damn-earthly-thing to be made SPECIFIC, ESPECIALLY for that gaze when that’s exactly what mainstream media, laws, and politics has catered to since…I don’t know, I’d wager since at least the beginning of colonialism. And of course that gaze befits a straight, white cis-male, which he probably is. (If he isn’t, then he’s upholding the white, heteronormative, patriarchal, colonial system that America was built on and still appeals to.) If you’re one of those people like he clearly is, it’d be great if you’d stop complaining when you can’t drool over female bodies who were not made solely for your pleasure or when you can’t see yourself in some major form of entertainment. How much have you heard women and POC complain about the fact that they’re not represented [positively] in the mainstream? Probably not much because the mainstream discredits and excludes that, too.

Basically, I hate to be so inflammatory, but I feel it’s wholly deserved: fuck off and let other people enjoy a documentary about a female artist and her art without smearing it with heteronormativity, homophobia, and sexism. And for the love of everything good in the world, don’t forget that it’s art. It doesn’t matter who made the art, it just matters what it says and how it makes you feel. That is the purpose of art, ultimately. Any artist will tell you that, too – “I just wanted to create something that would garner a reaction from someone.” If you can’t dig deep enough to ever be able to focus on that, then that is your problem.

Unfortunately, there’s one final beef I have to add: this reviewer acted like Ronstadt hadn’t been referring to her Mexican heritage since the ’70s – like she was white-passing up until she released her Spanish albums and redundantly added “Oh, I’m Mexican,” from there on out. I’ve read numerous articles and interviews with Ronstadt that go back to the early ’70s where she called herself Mexican, and German. She never made it seem like she was only white. If other people only saw her as white, they literally chose to only see her as white. That’s not her fucking problem – it’s THEIRS/YOURS. So please fuck off with that racist bullshit slandering mixed people. I am not here for it.

Honestly, I’d much rather focus on the fact that this documentary – judging from other reviews I read/skimmed/noticed since I have not seen it yet – is about her music and what a phenomenal vocalist she was. It’s about giving proper credit, FINALLY, to easily one of the greatest voices of the 20th century. It’s CELEBRATORY, not dramatic and scandalous, and from what I know about Ronstadt (as evidenced through her memoir, which I read and loved), that’s exactly what she would’ve preferred.

So anyway, I’m excited to see one of my favorite singers ever represented in a documentary and to hear what the interviewed artists had to say about her and her music, too.